3,000+ Trabajos

This Stage Utilized 3 Reward Models

DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese expert system company that establishes open-source big language designs (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, developed the company in 2023 and serves as its CEO.

The DeepSeek-R1 design offers responses comparable to other contemporary big language models, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a substantially lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and needs a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI designs were developed in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were planned to restrict the capability of these two countries to establish advanced AI systems. [6] [7]

On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its first totally free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had surpassed ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share rate to visit 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus bigger and more recognized rivals has actually been referred to as «overthrowing AI», [8] constituting «the first shot at what is becoming an international AI area race», [11] and ushering in «a brand-new age of AI brinkmanship». [12]

DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training information open-source, permitting its code to be easily offered for use, modification, viewing, and creating files for developing purposes. [13] The company supposedly vigorously hires young AI scientists from top Chinese universities, [8] and employs from outside the computer technology field to diversify its designs’ understanding and abilities. [3]

In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI enthusiast Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading because the 2007-2008 monetary crisis while going to Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he established High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer specifically used AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, implying its code is easily available for use, adjustment, and viewing. This includes authorization to gain access to and use the source code, along with style documents, for developing functions. [13]

According to 36Kr, Liang had developed a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are utilized to train AI [16], before the United States federal government imposed AI chip restrictions on China. [15]

In April 2023, High-Flyer started a synthetic basic intelligence laboratory devoted to research study developing AI tools different from High-Flyer’s financial organization. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own company, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Equity capital firms hesitated in providing funding as it was not likely that it would have the ability to create an exit in a short amount of time. [15]

After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which provided strong performance for a low price, DeepSeek became referred to as the driver for China’s AI design cost war. It was rapidly called the «Pinduoduo of AI«, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the price of their AI designs to take on the company. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its rivals that were losing cash. [20]

DeepSeek is focused on research study and has no in-depth prepare for commercialization; [20] this also enables its innovation to prevent the most rigid arrangements of China’s AI guidelines, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to comply with the government’s controls on information. [3]

DeepSeek’s hiring preferences target technical abilities instead of work experience, leading to many brand-new hires being either current university graduates or developers whose AI professions are less established. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires people with no computer system science background to help its innovation understand other subjects and understanding areas, including being able to produce poetry and perform well on the infamously difficult Chinese college admissions exams (Gaokao). [3]

Development and release history

DeepSeek LLM

On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its first series of model, DeepSeek-Coder, which is available free of charge to both scientists and industrial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an additional license arrangement («DeepSeek license») concerning «open and responsible downstream usage» for the model itself. [21]

They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 models, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]

1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of direction data. This produced the Instruct designs.

They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]

On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B criteria in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was launched). It was established to take on other LLMs readily available at the time. The paper claimed benchmark outcomes higher than the majority of open source LLMs at the time, especially Llama 2. [26]: area 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]

The architecture was essentially the exact same as those of the Llama series. They used the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text gotten by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]

The Chat variations of the two Base designs was also launched concurrently, obtained by training Base by supervised finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]

On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B activated per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the like DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They claimed similar efficiency with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a variation of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with «shared specialists» that are always queried, and «routed professionals» that may not be. They discovered this to assist with professional balancing. In basic MoE, some professionals can become excessively depended on, while other experts may be rarely used, wasting parameters. Attempting to balance the specialists so that they are equally utilized then causes professionals to duplicate the exact same capability. They proposed the shared experts to discover core capabilities that are often utilized, and let the routed experts to find out the peripheral capacities that are rarely used. [28]

In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]

1. Initialize with a formerly pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base model.
3. Train an instruction-following model by SFT Base with 776K math problems and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step services. This produced the Instruct design.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit model was a procedure benefit model (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd method. [30] This benefit design was then utilized to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions «related to GSM8K and MATH». The benefit model was constantly upgraded during training to avoid reward hacking. This resulted in the RL model.

V2

In May 2024, they launched the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series consists of 4 models, 2 base models (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The 2 larger designs were trained as follows: [31]

1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K using YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M instances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for safety. This led to DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL using GRPO in 2 phases. The very first phase was trained to resolve math and coding issues. This phase used 1 benefit model, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd phase was trained to be helpful, safe, and follow guidelines. This phase utilized 3 reward models. The helpfulness and safety reward designs were trained on human choice data. The rule-based benefit design was manually configured. All qualified reward designs were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the launched variation of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.

They chose 2-staged RL, since they discovered that RL on thinking information had «unique attributes» different from RL on basic data. For instance, RL on reasoning might improve over more training steps. [31]

The 2 V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and experienced similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat just underwent SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to assist «more research study and advancement on MLA and DeepSeekMoE». [31]

Architecturally, the V2 designs were significantly customized from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the basic attention system by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of experts (MoE) alternative formerly published in January. [28]

The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for every million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]

In June 2024, they released 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]

1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the variation at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base designs.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to create 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction information, then combined with an instruction dataset of 300M tokens. This was utilized for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for math issues was calculated by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code issues was produced by a benefit model trained to predict whether a would pass the system tests.

DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and updated in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]

V3

In December 2024, they launched a base model DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat model DeepSeek-V3. The design architecture is essentially the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]

1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mainly English and Chinese. It consisted of a higher ratio of math and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length twice, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (mathematics, programs, logic) and non-reasoning (innovative writing, roleplay, simple concern answering) data. Reasoning information was generated by «skilled models». Non-reasoning data was created by DeepSeek-V2.5 and inspected by humans. – The «skilled models» were trained by starting with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both data, and artificial data created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system prompt asked the R1 to reflect and validate throughout thinking. Then the expert models were RL utilizing an undefined reward function.
– Each expert design was trained to produce just synthetic reasoning data in one particular domain (math, programs, reasoning).
– Expert designs were used, rather of R1 itself, because the output from R1 itself suffered «overthinking, poor format, and extreme length».

4. Model-based reward models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice data consisting of both last benefit and chain-of-thought leading to the last reward. The reward design produced reward signals for both questions with objective but free-form responses, and questions without objective answers (such as imaginative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both reward designs and rule-based reward. The rule-based reward was calculated for mathematics problems with a final response (put in a box), and for shows problems by system tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.

The DeepSeek team performed comprehensive low-level engineering to accomplish effectiveness. They utilized mixed-precision arithmetic. Much of the forward pass was performed in 8-bit floating point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) rather than the standard 32-bit, needing unique GEMM routines to build up accurately. They used a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They minimized the communication latency by overlapping extensively calculation and interaction, such as devoting 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They decreased communication by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the specific maker each specialist was on in order to prevent particular makers being queried more frequently than the others, adding auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing strategies. [37]

After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are linked by NVLink, and the clusters are linked by InfiniBand. [37]

Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 exceeded Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]

R1

On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview ended up being accessible via DeepSeek’s API, as well as through a chat user interface after visiting. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical inference, mathematical thinking, and real-time problem-solving. DeepSeek declared that it surpassed efficiency of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal mentioned when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a service much faster than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]

On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek launched DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The company also released some «DeepSeek-R1-Distill» designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however instead are initialized from other pretrained open-weight designs, consisting of LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial data produced by R1. [47]

A discussion between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant fixes it. The assistant initially considers the thinking procedure in the mind and after that supplies the user with the answer. The thinking process and response are confined within and tags, respectively, i.e., reasoning process here address here. User:. Assistant:

DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically using GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous versions, they used no model-based benefit. All reward functions were rule-based, «generally» of two types (other types were not defined): precision benefits and format benefits. Accuracy reward was examining whether a boxed response is proper (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for programming). Format benefit was checking whether the design puts its thinking trace within … [47]

As R1-Zero has problems with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to resolve these issues and more enhance thinking: [47]

1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on «thousands» of «cold-start» data all with the standard format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the exact same RL procedure as R1-Zero, however likewise with a «language consistency reward» to motivate it to respond monolingually. This produced an internal model not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking data from the internal design, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the produced reasoning had a wrong last answer, then it is eliminated). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) using DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic information for 2 dates.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based benefit (for reasoning jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.

Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K data synthesized from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable way as step 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]

Assessment and reactions

DeepSeek released its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had gone beyond ChatGPT as the highest-rated free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly addresses concerns, resolves logic problems and composes computer programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests used by American AI companies. [3]

DeepSeek-V3 uses significantly less resources compared to its peers; for example, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as numerous as 16,000 graphics processing systems (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek claims to require only about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at a cost of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech huge Meta spent constructing its newest AI technology. [3]

DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at relatively minimal expense has been acknowledged as possibly challenging the global supremacy of American AI models. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a «Sputnik minute» for American AI. [49] [50] The performance of its R1 model was apparently «on par with» one of OpenAI’s newest designs when used for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other commentators, American Silicon Valley endeavor capitalist Marc Andreessen similarly described R1 as «AI‘s Sputnik moment». [51]

DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has actually been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media extensively praised DeepSeek as a nationwide asset. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang invited Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with experts and asked him to provide opinions and ideas on a draft for remarks of the yearly 2024 federal government work report. [55]

DeepSeek’s optimization of minimal resources has highlighted potential limitations of United States sanctions on China’s AI advancement, that include export restrictions on innovative AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the business’s AI models consequently «stimulated market turmoil» [57] and triggered shares in significant global technology business to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of competing Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip devices maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 model, had caused record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware business; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of value was wiped off American stocks. [50]

Leading figures in the American AI sector had mixed responses to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose business are associated with the United States government-backed «Stargate Project» to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek «super remarkable». [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who revealed The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a favorable development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, including Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed hesitation of the app’s performance or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, including Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are seeking to utilize the model in their program. [68]

On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its new user registration to contact number from mainland China, e-mail addresses, or Google account logins, following a «massive» cyberattack interrupted the correct performance of its servers. [69] [70]

Some sources have observed that the main application shows interface (API) version of R1, which ranges from servers found in China, uses censorship mechanisms for subjects that are considered politically sensitive for the government of China. For instance, the design declines to respond to concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI might initially produce a response, but then erases it shortly afterwards and changes it with a message such as: «Sorry, that’s beyond my present scope. Let’s speak about something else.» [72] The integrated censorship systems and constraints can just be eliminated to a limited extent in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the «core socialist worths» specified by the Chinese Internet regulative authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, discussions are ended. [74] When evaluated by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 explained Taiwan as «an inalienable part of China’s area,» and specified: «We securely oppose any type of ‘Taiwan independence’ separatist activities and are committed to attaining the complete reunification of the motherland through serene means.» [75] In January 2025, Western scientists had the ability to deceive DeepSeek into providing specific answers to some of these topics by requesting in its answer to swap particular letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]

Security and personal privacy

Some experts fear that the government of China could use the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading out disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy terms and conditions state «We save the info we collect in safe servers found in individuals’s Republic of China … We might collect your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other material that you supply to our model and Services». Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired short article reports this as security concerns. [80] In response, the Italian data protection authority is seeking additional info on DeepSeek’s collection and use of personal data, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had started a national security review. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government banned making use of DeepSeek at federal government ministries on security grounds and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s usage of individual details. [83]

Expert system market in China.

Notes

^ a b c The variety of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model named DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was launched as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview needed selecting «Deep Think made it possible for», and every user could utilize it only 50 times a day.
References

^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). «China’s low-cost, open AI model DeepSeek thrills researchers». Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). «The DeepSeek panic exposes an AI world prepared to blow». The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). «How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Competing With Silicon Valley Giants». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). «DeepSeek’s cheaper designs and weaker chips bring into question trillions in AI facilities spending». Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). «Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports may hit India’s AI aspirations». The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). «Nvidia examination signals expanding of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly». Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). «Nvidia targeted by China in brand-new chip war probe». BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). «What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?». The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). «China’s DeepSeek AI dismisses ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you ought to understand». CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). «What is DeepSeek, and why is it causing Nvidia and other stocks to drop?». CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). «Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants». ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). «Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.» The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). «ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key». Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). «How a top Chinese AI design conquered US sanctions». MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). «Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker». ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). «Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.» CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).» [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says». Yicai Global. Archived from the initial on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). «Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI designs are trained». South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). «The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer». Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). «Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race». ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ «DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder». GitHub. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ «DeepSeek Coder». deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ «deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face». huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, recovered 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ «config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main». huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ «config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at main». huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ «deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face». huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ «config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at main». huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). «Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model outperforms Meta, OpenAI products». South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). «DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outshines Llama and Qwen on launch». VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). «DeepSeek’s brand-new AI model seems among the finest ‘open’ oppositions yet». TechCrunch. Archived from the initial on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ «Deepseek Log in page». DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ «News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: letting loose supercharged thinking power!». DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the initial on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). «DeepSeek’s very first thinking model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance». VentureBeat. Archived from the original on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). «Don’t Look Now, however China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast». The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ «Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce». GitHub. Archived from the initial on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ «Chinese AI startup DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store». Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). «American AI has reached its Sputnik minute». The Hill. Archived from the original on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). «‘ Sputnik moment’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese firm reveals AI chatbot» – through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). «Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets». BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). «What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business». CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ «DeepSeek poses an obstacle to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley». The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). «Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock thrashing, Graphika states». Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). «量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 ， 他还创办了» AI界拼多多»». finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). «Chinese AI business’s AI model development highlights limits of US sanctions». Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ «DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market chaos, wiping $500bn off Nvidia». BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). «Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap». Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). «DeepSeek sparks international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of value». Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). «DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical». Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). «Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as «super remarkable»: «We need to take the advancements out of China very, very seriously»». Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). «OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘remarkable'». The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). «Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide». The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). «Johnson bashes China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement «favorable»». Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). «China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street» – via NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). «Musk dismisses, Altman praises: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s interruption». Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ «Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests enormous Nvidia GPU infrastructure». Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. «Big AWS customers, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs». Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). «DeepSeek hit with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores». The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. «DeepSeek momentarily limited new sign-ups, pointing out ‘massive malicious attacks'». Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). «Chinese AI has actually stimulated a $1 trillion panic – and it does not care about totally free speech». The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). «DeepSeek: This is what live censorship looks like in the Chinese AI chatbot». Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). «We experimented with DeepSeek. It worked well, until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ «The Guardian view on an international AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of chaos». The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). «Chinese AI DeepSeek jolts Silicon Valley, offering the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'». NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). «China’s DeepSeek AI presents formidable cyber, information personal privacy dangers». Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). «Experts advise care over usage of Chinese AI DeepSeek». The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). «DeepSeek’s success has painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back». LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ «Privacy policy». Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). «DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China». Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ «Italy regulator seeks info from DeepSeek on information defense». Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). «White House examines effect of China AI app DeepSeek on national security, official states». Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.